Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back
5th February 2012: Are the GW crooks on the run at last?
5th February 2012: The USA - arrogant, bullying and incredibly stupid
31st January 2012: We don't make anything any more
29th January 2012: Don't go to Jamaica, it's a dump and you'll get murdered with a machete
29th January 2012: That's a relief, it's not just here, then ...
29th January 2012: There are no true democracies in the world - discuss
27th January 2012: There's always a word for it, they say, and if there isn't we'll invent one
26th January 2012: Literary criticism on GOS? How posh!
17th January 2012: Max Hastings talking sense about Europe. Practically the only one, then ...
12th January 2012: Stop bleating that you have a difficut job, and GET IT RIGHT!
23rd December 2011: A Merry Christmas to both our readers
21st December 2011: Some quotes about sex from famous people ...
12th December 2011: Plain speaking by a scientist about the global warming fraud
11th December 2011: Did the boy Dave done good for once?
11th December 2011: Whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad
11th December 2011: It's not jusst polar bears, you know, the BBC can be biased about ANYTHING!
9th December 2011: Who trusts scientists? Apart from the BBC, of course?
7th December 2011: All in all, not a good week for British justice ...
2nd December 2011: How our schools are failing children ...
24th November 2011: We didn't have the green thing in our day ...
13th November 2011: The truth revealed about the IPCC?
9th November 2011: Well what d'you know, the law really IS a bit of an ass ...
8th November 2011: How the Nazi legacy still taints the life of Europe ...
27th October 2011: Cameron backs self-determination for the Libyans, but not for us

 

 
Our Wanker of the Week award
Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
Readers wives. Yes, really!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net
Sign our Guest Book
 

 
Older stuff
 

 
NO2ID - Stop ID cards and the database state
 

 
Both the RAC and the AA have now called for the speed-limit on motorways to be raised to 80 m.p.h. (some motorways, anyway, in good driving conditions). They say that (a) motorways are statistically our safest roads, (b) very many drivers are doing this speed routinely anyway, and (c) police rarely prosecute under 80 m.p.h.
 
Naturally the road safety industry have leapt in heavy-footed already. The rather photogenic Jools Townsend, Campaign and Communications Manager for "Brake" (that's the so-called road safety organisation, rather akin to the Luddites so far as I can see) claimed on television today that research exists showing that an increase to 80 m.p.h. would raise the accident level by 10%.
 
Being too old to fall for the obvious charms of Jools, The Brainless Man's Bimbo, I wondered "What research is that then?" The first place to look was on Brake's own website.
 
Lo and behold, there on the front page was a link called "Research". "Great," I thought, "they wouldn't go public on television without giving details on their website ….. would they?" So I clicked - and, what do you know? - it said "Site under construction". How convenient. I went back and clicked on the link called "Cameras". Also under construction.
 
So come on, lovely Jools, what's this research then? Who has shown that raising a speed limit by 10 m.p.h. increases the accident rate by the same amount? And how did they show it? I can't think of anywhere in the world that has recently raised its speed limits by 10 m.p.h.*, and without doing that, how can you reliably show what it would do to the accident statistics?
 
You're not telling a little porky here, are you, Jools? Not on national television? You didn't just make it all up, safe in the knowledge that if anyone questioned it you could flash back at them "Oh, so you're in favour of killing and maiming old ladies and little children, are you?"
 
Well no, Jools, I'm not. What I'm in favour of is a bit of joined-up thinking on an issue that affects every one of us. Motorways and dual carriageways are statistically safer than ordinary roads (the Brake website says so, so it must be true …. mustn't it?). The national speed-limit on motorways and dual-carriageways is 10 m.p.h. higher than on ordinary roads, yet the accident rate is not 10% greater - quite the opposite. So logically it's not the SPEED that kills, it's the ROADS.
 
But logic's not your strong point, is it, Jools? You prefer the quick sound-bite, the knee-jerk reaction and the catchy slogan. So "Speed kills". It isn't true, but if you keep saying it often enough, people will believe it. I wonder how you sleep at night - do you count speed cameras? Or perhaps it's sheep, like the ones in "Animal Farm", jumping over a fence onto the motorway and bleating "Two legs good, four wheels bad!"
 
How's this for a bit of joined-up thinking? If motorways and dual carriageways are safer, what's the biggest difference between them and ordinary roads? It's the fact that traffic travelling in one direction is separated from traffic travelling the other way. Why can't we do that on ordinary roads?
 
They do in France. Driving in Provence last year I used a stretch of winding road that had tall plastic red-and-white blades standing up down the centre. They wouldn't hurt if you hit one, but they jolly-well stopped you from overtaking anywhere silly. Cheap and effective. Mind you, France is the country where they have variable speed-limits on motorways - one speed in dry conditions, another when the weather's bad. Much too sensible for us, then.

 
* But I do know of a province in Canada that recently removed all its speed cameras. Their statistics showed that people driving 10 m.p.h. below the speed-limit had far more accidents than those driving 10 m.p.h. above. Probably the ones who were speeding were actually watching the road, while those who weren't were admiring the scenery and congratulating themselves on being such safe drivers. But that's in Canada, so I suppose it doesn't count.
 

 
Comments from our visitors
 

 

 

 
Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2007 The GOS
 
This site created and maintained by PlainSite