We're not making any comment on this news story from the Chicago Tribune newspaper, because it's just so bloody stupid. Only in America.
Er, we hope ...
Raised in a $1.5 million Barrington Hills, Illinois, home by their attorney father, two grown children have spent the last two years pursuing a unique lawsuit against their mom for "bad mothering" that alleges damages caused when she failed to buy toys for one and sent another a birthday card he didn’t like.
The alleged offences include failing to take her daughter to a car show, telling her then 7-year-old son to buckle his seat belt or she would contact police, "haggling" over the amount to spend on party dresses and calling her daughter at midnight to ask that she return home from celebrating homecoming.
Last week, at which point the court record stood about a foot tall, an Illinois appeals court dismissed the case, finding that none of the mother’s conduct was "extreme or outrageous." To rule in favour of her children "could potentially open the floodgates to subject family childrearing to ... excessive judicial scrutiny and interference."
In 2009, the children, represented by three attorneys including their father, Steven A. Miner, sued their mother, Kimberly Garrity. Steven II, now 23, and his sister Kathryn, now 20, sought more than $50,000 for "emotional distress." Miner and Garrity were married for a decade before she filed for divorce in 1995.
Among the exhibits filed in the case is a birthday card Garrity sent her son, who in his lawsuit sought damages because the card was "inappropriate" and failed to include cash or a cheque. He also alleged she failed to send a card for years or, while he was in college, “care packages”. On the front of the card is a picture of tomatoes spread across a table that are indistinguishable except for one in the middle with craft-store googly eyes attached. "Son I got you this Birthday card because it’s just like you ... different from all the rest!" the card reads. On the inside Garrity wrote "Have a great day! Love & Hugs, Mom xoxoxo."
In court papers, Garrity’s attorney Shelley Smith says the "litany of childish complaints and ingratitude" in the lawsuit is nothing more than an attempt by Garrity’s ex-husband to "seek the ultimate revenge" of having her children accuse her of "being an inadequate mother."
"It would be laughable that these children of privilege would sue their mother for emotional distress, if the consequences were not so deadly serious," Smith wrote. "There is no insurance for this claim, so (Garrity) must pay her legal fees, while (the children) have their father for free."
Messages left for Smith (by this paper) were not returned. Steven A. Miner, reached by phone, did not comment. In court papers he said he only filed the lawsuit after much legal research and had tried to dissuade his children from bringing the case.
The Cook County judge who ruled on the case, Kathy Flanagan, declined to assess sanctions against Miner, but said the lawsuit amounted to nothing more than children "suing their mother for bad mothering."
DePaul University law professor Bruce Ottley, who co-wrote a textbook on Illinois tort law, says courts have long carved out an exception to family members suing each other, barring any extreme conduct. "If junior slips on the rug in the living room and sues mom or dad, that can’t happen," Ottley said.
He said such emotional distress damages are a way for the legal system to address situations — sexual harassment for instance — where there is no physical harm. But those bringing a case to court must prove the conduct was outrageous. "The fact that it is such a high standard, it doesn’t succeed very often," Ottley said.
In court filings, Garrity’s attorney writes that "she does still love" her children but found that they wanted "the benefits afforded by a family relationship, but none of the restraints."
Steven A. Miner wrote that the case is no different than a patient suing a physician "for bad doctoring." "(The children) do not view their (lawsuit) as an attack on mothering, but rather on accountability," he wrote. "Everyone makes mistakes, but ... there must be accountability for actions. Parenting is no different."
Garrity called the lawsuit nothing but harassment. "Everything ... shows that these children, orchestrated by their father, will stop at nothing to embarrass and financially harm their mother," Smith wrote in a court filing. "In the process they have embarrassed themselves and left a public record blogged about on the Internet that will shadow their every future relationship."
The GOS says: A word of caution, mind. Newspaper stories are sometimes inaccurate and reporters can get the wrong end of the stick. I remember several years ago awarding the title Wanker of the Week to a gentleman who was widely reported to have taken video footage of a lady walking naked in her garden, and using the film to bring a court case against her.
He quickly contacted me. It turned out that it wasn't actually her garden she was walking in, but his. He had been advised by the police to get video evidence that they could use, and in fact the video was made not by him, but by workmen who were repairing his house.
Fortunately he was very nice about it, and appreciative of the fact that we published a correction immediately, which was not the case with the local and national newspapers who had taken the faulty story from a freelance journalist who had been present in court – and hadn't been listening properly, it seems.
Still, that was in Wales, and this story comes from America. I'd believe any lunacy from them ...
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.
Copyright © 2011 The GOS