Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back
5th February 2012: Are the GW crooks on the run at last?
5th February 2012: The USA - arrogant, bullying and incredibly stupid
31st January 2012: We don't make anything any more
29th January 2012: Don't go to Jamaica, it's a dump and you'll get murdered with a machete
29th January 2012: That's a relief, it's not just here, then ...
29th January 2012: There are no true democracies in the world - discuss
27th January 2012: There's always a word for it, they say, and if there isn't we'll invent one
26th January 2012: Literary criticism on GOS? How posh!
17th January 2012: Max Hastings talking sense about Europe. Practically the only one, then ...
12th January 2012: Stop bleating that you have a difficut job, and GET IT RIGHT!
23rd December 2011: A Merry Christmas to both our readers
21st December 2011: Some quotes about sex from famous people ...
12th December 2011: Plain speaking by a scientist about the global warming fraud
11th December 2011: Did the boy Dave done good for once?
11th December 2011: Whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad
11th December 2011: It's not jusst polar bears, you know, the BBC can be biased about ANYTHING!
9th December 2011: Who trusts scientists? Apart from the BBC, of course?
7th December 2011: All in all, not a good week for British justice ...
2nd December 2011: How our schools are failing children ...
24th November 2011: We didn't have the green thing in our day ...
13th November 2011: The truth revealed about the IPCC?
9th November 2011: Well what d'you know, the law really IS a bit of an ass ...
8th November 2011: How the Nazi legacy still taints the life of Europe ...
27th October 2011: Cameron backs self-determination for the Libyans, but not for us

 

 
Our Wanker of the Week award
Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
Readers wives. Yes, really!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net
Sign our Guest Book
 

 
Older stuff
 

 
NO2ID - Stop ID cards and the database state
 

 

 
It's always good to have one's own views confirmed, and the big splash on the front of the Mail on Sunday this week did exactly that.
 
Undercover reporters posing as agents for an East European country had contacted the firm that makes most of the speed cameras in the UK, and elicited some amazing information that reinforces all our fears. You can read the whole article here.
 
The boss of a leading supplier of the devices admitted "There will be so much money coming in you won't know what to do with it." He urged the reporters to site the cameras not where accidents had occurred but where they could catch "businessmen in the morning and school-run mums in the afternoon." He went on to claim that the courts which process fines and issue the points on a driver's licence have been struggling to cope with all the cheques.
 
The article also explains how the government is manipulating the camera industry so that it can rake in vast profits. The government takes ALL the revenue from speed cameras, then gives some of it back. Each camera partnership sets a target of the number of motorists it will catch each year. If it fails to meet the target, the government cuts its share of the revenue. If it achieves more than its target, the government keeps all the extra money. Of course that means that next year the partnership will set a higher target so it can attract a larger grant - and although it escapes any of the blame, the Government picks up all the profits!
 
Doesn't sound as though road safety is much of a prime consideration, does it?
 
The camera firm, Tele-Traffic UK, supplies 97 per cent of the country's police forces with portable laser cameras which are hand-held or set up in special roving police vans. It is run by three former policemen.
 
Tele-Traffic sells basic hand-held laser speed cameras for £3,000 and the directors told how this could be recovered from speeding drivers in just an hour, saying "Take the UK model of £60 a pop. If you buy a piece of our kit at £3,000, then operate it in a two-hour session, on an averagely busy road, you will catch about 100 drivers that's £6,000."
 
Predictably this news has been greeted with the usual response - "If you don't want to pay the fines, don't speed". That's all very well if the speed limits the cameras are enforcing have been set at appropriate levels and with regard to the nature of the road and its accident history. Sadly, speed limits are put in place by local authorities, not the police, and some local authorities do so for very dubious reasons. We have written before about Suffolk's disastrous record, for instance, where the introduction of blanket 30mph limits (450 of them all at once) led to a 69% increase in fatalities the next year. On Suffolk's most dangerous road, the A140 between Diss and Coddenham, a confusing system of varying limits has been put in place against the wishes of local people, simply to avoid spending money on improving the road.
 
The government's own advice to local authorities acknowledges that drivers cannot (not will not, but can not) obey a speed limit that differs too much from the average speed on that piece of road, and advises using a calculation called the 85th percentile to establish the correct speed for the road. Sadly, many local authorities either don't understand or choose to ignore this advice.
 
The argument that if one doesn't like being fined one shouldn't speed is not so far removed from those sad little doormats who don't object to ID cards - or any of the other invasions our privacy is threatened by these days - because "I've got nothing to hide so why should I worry?"
 
The reason they should worry is precisely because they have nothing to hide - so why should they be tagged and spied-on like convicts or cattle? The history of the 20th Century is haunted by the sad wraiths of millions of people who felt they had nothing to hide right up to the moment the doorbell rang and the jackboots clattered on the front step.
 

 
The GOS says: You could do worse than look at these other articles on the same subject …
 
Loophole could invalidate thousands of camera fines
Camera statistics don't add up
Avoid a ticket by changing lanes

 

 

 
Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2007 The GOS
 
This site created and maintained by PlainSite