Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back
11th September 2013: The world's gone mad and I'm the only one who knows
13th August 2013: Black is white. Fact. End of.
11th August 2013: Electric cars, not as green as they're painted?
18th June 2013: Wrinklies unite, you have nothing to lose but your walking frames!
17th May 2013: Some actual FACTS about climate change (for a change) from actual scientists ...
10th May 2013: An article about that poison gas, carbon dioxide, and other scientific facts (not) ...
10th May 2013: We need to see past the sex and look at the crimes: is justice being served?
8th May 2013: So, who would you trust to treat your haemorrhoids, Theresa May?
8th May 2013: Why should citizens in the 21st Century fear the law so much?
30th April 2013: What the GOS says today, the rest of the world realises tomorrow ...
30th April 2013: You couldn't make it up, could you? Luckily you don't need to ...
29th April 2013: a vote for NONE OF THE ABOVE, because THE ABOVE are crap ...
28th April 2013: what goes around, comes around?
19th April 2013: everyone's a victim these days ...
10th April 2013: Thatcher is dead; long live Thatcher!
8th April 2013: Poor people are such a nuisance. Just give them loads of money and they'll go away ...
26th March 2013: Censorship is alive and well and coming for you ...
25th March 2013: Just do your job properly, is that too much to ask?
25th March 2013: So, what do you think caused your heterosexuality?
20th March 2013: Feminists - puritans, hypocrites or just plain stupid?
18th March 2013: How Nazi Germany paved the way for modern governance?
13th March 2013: Time we all grew up and lived in the real world ...
12th March 2013: Hindenburg crash mystery solved? - don't you believe it!
6th March 2013: Is this the real GOS?
5th March 2013: All that's wrong with taxes
25th February 2013: The self-seeking MP who is trying to bring Britain down ...
24th February 2013: Why can't newspapers just tell the truth?
22nd February 2013: Trial by jury - a radical proposal
13th February 2013: A little verse for two very old people ...
6th February 2013: It's not us after all, it's worms
6th February 2013: Now here's a powerful argument FOR gay marriage ...
4th February 2013: There's no such thing as equality because we're not all the same ...
28th January 2013: Global Warming isn't over - IT'S HIDING!
25th January 2013: Global Warmers: mad, bad and dangerous to know ...
25th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
19th January 2013: We STILL haven't got our heads straight about gays ...
16th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
11th January 2013: What it's like being English ...
7th January 2013: Bleat, bleat, if it saves the life of just one child ...
7th January 2013: How best to put it? 'Up yours, Argentina'?
7th January 2013: Chucking even more of other people's money around ...
6th January 2013: Chucking other people's money around ...
30th December 2012: The BBC is just crap, basically ...
30th December 2012: We mourn the passing of a genuine Grumpy Old Sod ...
30th December 2012: How an official body sets out to ruin Christmas ...
16th December 2012: Why should we pardon Alan Turing when he did nothing wrong?
15th December 2012: When will social workers face up to their REAL responsibility?
15th December 2012: Unfair trading by a firm in Bognor Regis ...
14th December 2012: Now the company that sells your data is pretending to act as watchdog ...
7th December 2012: There's a war between cars and bikes, apparently, and  most of us never noticed!
26th November 2012: The bottom line - social workers are just plain stupid ...
20th November 2012: So, David Eyke was right all along, then?
15th November 2012: MPs don't mind dishing it out, but when it's them in the firing line ...
14th November 2012: The BBC has a policy, it seems, about which truths it wants to tell ...
12th November 2012: Big Brother, coming to a school near you ...
9th November 2012: Yet another celebrity who thinks, like Jimmy Saville, that he can behave just as he likes because he's famous ...
5th November 2012: Whose roads are they, anyway? After all, we paid for them ...
7th May 2012: How politicians could end droughts at a stroke if they chose ...
6th May 2012: The BBC, still determined to keep us in a fog of ignorance ...
2nd May 2012: A sense of proportion lacking?
24th April 2012: Told you so, told you so, told you so ...
15th April 2012: Aah, sweet ickle polar bears in danger, aah ...
15th April 2012: An open letter to Anglian Water ...
30th March 2012: Now they want to cure us if we don't believe their lies ...
28th February 2012: Just how useful is a degree? Not very.
27th February 2012: ... so many ways to die ...
15th February 2012: DO go to Jamaica because you definitely WON'T get murdered with a machete. Ms Fox says so ...
31st January 2012: We don't make anything any more
27th January 2012: There's always a word for it, they say, and if there isn't we'll invent one
26th January 2012: Literary criticism on GOS? How posh!
12th December 2011: Plain speaking by a scientist about the global warming fraud
9th December 2011: Who trusts scientists? Apart from the BBC, of course?
7th December 2011: All in all, not a good week for British justice ...
9th November 2011: Well what d'you know, the law really IS a bit of an ass ...

 

 
Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net

 

 
Older stuff
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Well, it's at least three weeks since we wrote about Global Bloody Warming, but we're damned if we're going to knuckle under to the government's bullying, so let's have another go. This Is Money reports this week that government advisers are recommending that Climate Change Secretary Ed Milipede should introduce a new scheme whereby householders should be compelled to take out government loans to install even more double-glazing and insulation in their homes, and that people who refuse will be penalised with higher council taxes. If they haven't paid off the loan by the time they sell the house, the debt will be transferred to the buyer, which should encourage the housing market to pick up - we don't think.
 
As one Daily Mail reader pointed out indignantly, his house is like a bloody sauna already, and extra insulation is the last thing he needs. The GOS agrees - in his bedroom the window is permanently open and the radiator turned off throughout the year, as he believes you have bedclothes to keep you warm. In China they don't heat the spaces in which they live, believing you should heat yourself instead by wearing suitable clothing. Very sensible.
 
The new scheme is suspect right from the start as it is to be announced by one John Adams, of Knauf Insulation, which provides - you guessed it - loft and cavity wall insulation. There is no truth in the rumour that when Ed Milipede is chucked out of parliament (oh, we wish) he'll walk into a cosy directorship at Knauf Insulation. No truth at all. Yet.
 
Odd, isn't it, the way these people's minds work? They warn that the earth is heating up but they want us to make our homes even warmer. What are they trying to do - cook us?
 
Ed Milipede is about to reveal another piece of draconian foolishness in the new White Paper about government's plans for the expansion of green energy. Millions of families face being hit with higher fuel bills to pay for a new 'green energy revolution'. The levies will help pay for the building of 7,000 wind turbines over the next 11 years.
 
At present the renewables element of the typical household bill is an average 55 a year, but this could increase to as much as 120 by 2014, and the respected UK Energy Research Centre has predicted that by 2050 the subsidy will cost the economy at least 17billion a year, the equivalent of an extra 700 a year per household.
 
The White Paper follows the Government's pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 34 per cent within 11 years, and by 80 per cent within 40 years. Britain is the only country in the world stupid enough to adopt legally binding carbon dioxide targets (you remember carbon dioxide? That's the poisonous planet-killing gas we all ... er ... breathe out. How reprehensible of us). The UK also faces tough European targets to ensure that at least 30 to 40 per cent of Britain's electricity will be generated by wind, solar, wave and tidal power by 2020.
 
Currently, just three per cent of the UK's electricity comes from renewable sources.
 
The Government says the shift away from fossil fuels towards wind, nuclear, tidal, solar and biomass power is essential to prevent dangerous climate change. They warn that the country could face deadly heatwaves, rising sea levels and regular floods within 50 years unless urgent action is taken to 'decarbonise', insisting on pushing the same hysterical mumbo-jumbo that most people in this country, including very many scientists, recognise for what it is - superstitious hogwash.
 
The White Paper is expected to propose 'social tariffs' to ease the burden of higher energy bills on the poor and the elderly, but the Government's advisers on climate change say the greenhouse-gas targets could push 1.7million into fuel poverty all the same. Energy companies will be told to subsidise the cost for the poor by adding extra to the bills of better-off customers.
 
The White Paper will also say that climate change targets can be reached only with a massive expansion of offshore wind farms, and will introduce incentives for householders to produce their own energy from solar panels, ground source heat pumps and combined heat and power units. The government will, of course, be doing their bit by increasing their output of hot air.
 
Matthew Sinclair of the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'The last thing that the Government should be doing right now is pushing up electricity bills even more to line the pockets of renewable energy firms. Wind farms aren't delivering reliable energy when we need it, and their massive subsidies are paid for by pushing up ordinary people's bills. Action needs to be taken to reduce the burden of ineffective climate change policies, instead of ploughing blindly on and throwing even more money at the problem.'
 
If it is a problem, of course. This masterly demolition of the IPCC by Dr.David Evans of the Science and Public Policy Institute makes it quite clear that our problem is not vanishing polar bears or melting glaciers, but dishonest politicians with an eye to the main chance. Nothing new there, then.
 
Speaking of polar bears (and why not? They're lovely fluffy cuddly animals after all, not vicious killers we wouldn't want to share a continent with), Christopher Booker writes in the Telegraph about the latest fair and even-handed approach to rational debate by the green alarmists of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature/Species Survival Commission.
 
Over the coming days a curiously revealing event will be taking place in Copenhagen. Top of the agenda at a meeting of the Polar Bear Specialist Group (set up under the IUCNature/Species Survival Commission) will be the need to produce a suitably scary report on how polar bears are being threatened with extinction by man-made global warming.
 
This is one of a steady drizzle of events planned to stoke up alarm in the run-up to the UN's major conference on climate change in Copenhagen next December. But one of the world's leading experts on polar bears has been told to stay away from this week's meeting, specifically because his views on global warming do not accord with those of the rest of the group.
 
Dr Mitchell Taylor has been researching the status and management of polar bears in Canada and around the Arctic Circle for 30 years, as both an academic and a government employee. More than once since 2006 he has made headlines by insisting that polar bear numbers, far from decreasing, are much higher than they were 30 years ago. Of the 19 different bear populations, almost all are increasing or at optimum levels, only two have for local reasons modestly declined.
 
Dr Taylor agrees that the Arctic has been warming over the last 30 years. But he ascribes this not to rising levels of CO2 as is dictated by the computer models of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and believed by his PBSG colleagues but to currents bringing warm water into the Arctic from the Pacific and the effect of winds blowing in from the Bering Sea.
 
He has also observed, however, how the melting of Arctic ice, supposedly threatening the survival of the bears, has rocketed to the top of the warmists' agenda as their most iconic single cause. The famous photograph of two bears standing forlornly on a melting iceberg was produced thousands of times by Al Gore, the WWF and others as an emblem of how the bears faced extinction until last year the photographer, Amanda Byrd, revealed that the bears, just off the Alaska coast, were in no danger. Her picture had nothing to do with global warming and was only taken because the wind-sculpted ice they were standing on made such a striking image.
 

 
Dr Taylor had obtained funding to attend this week's meeting of the PBSG, but this was voted down by its members because of his views on global warming. The chairman, Dr Andy Derocher, a former university pupil of Dr Taylor's, frankly explained that his rejection had nothing to do with his undoubted expertise on polar bears: "it was the position you've taken on global warming that brought opposition".
 
Dr Taylor was told that his views running "counter to human-induced climate change are extremely unhelpful". His signing of the Manhattan Declaration a statement by 500 scientists that the causes of climate change are not CO2 but natural, such as changes in the radiation of the sun and ocean currents was "inconsistent with the position taken by the PBSG".
 
So, as the great Copenhagen bandwagon rolls on, stand by this week for reports along the lines of "scientists say polar bears are threatened with extinction by vanishing Arctic ice". But also check out Anthony Watt's Watts Up With That website for the latest news of what is actually happening in the Arctic. The average temperature at midsummer is still below zero, the latest date that this has happened in 50 years of record-keeping. After last year's recovery from its September 2007 low, this year's ice melt is likely to be substantially less than for some time. The bears are doing fine.

 
Back on our own doorstep, mercifully polar-bear-free (though it's worth remembering that only a mere thirty years ago some scientists were predicting that Britain was doomed to an arctic climate akin to that of Newfoundland) it's the BBC that is doing so much to stifle reasoned debate about climate change. We've all noticed how every single wild-life and natural world programme has to have the obligatory warning about how the rain forests/oceans/coral reefs/ickle birdy-wirdies/nasty little rat-like creatures in the deepest Sumatran jungle are facing extinction because we don't turn our mobile phones off. The most recent scare has it that the world's sharks are dying out, to which our immediate response is "bloody good job, vicious bastards".
 
Of the BBC, veteran broadcaster Peter Sissons recently went on record about the treatment of "interviewers who have so much as raised the possibility that there is another side to the debate on climate change. The Corporation's most famous interrogators invariably begin by accepting that "the science is settled", when there are countless reputable scientists and climatologists producing work that says it isn't. But it is effectively BBC policy ... that those views should not be heard."
 
And the BBC aren't the only organisation taking a partisan attitude. Most of the predictions about global warming are based on computer models (which we take to mean computer simulations), but there seems to be a lot of secrecy about just what data goes in to those computer models to produce the results they claim. It's obvious, of course, that what comes out is only as good as what goes in, but the Met Office and other organisations refuse to say what they're putting in, in case someone is bright enough to point out exactly why they're mistaken.
 
There's a Number Ten Petition here. It says "We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to force the Climate Research Unit, or other publicly funded organisations, to release the source codes used in their computer models ... these are tax-payer funded institutions, which are influencing government policy decisions which will affect the day to day lives of us all. With the Prime Minister's belief in a new age of transparency, it is unsupportable that these publicly funded organisations are not open to public scrutiny".
 
Right on. Sadly the petition has attracted only a few names as yet, so do sign it.
 

 
The GOS says: And while you're there, you might pop your name on this one as well. It's got nothing to do with climate change (or .... cue sinister music ... has it?), but sign it anyway. It demands that the UK should leave the EU, which is something I'm sure we can all relate to.
 
It's free, as well, which is more than you can say for the feckin' EU.

 

 
Grumpy Old Sod.com - homepage
 

 
Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2009 The GOS
 
Grumpy Old Sod.com - homepage

 

Captain Grumpy's
Favourites
- some older posts

 
Campaign
 
Proposal
 
Burglars
 
Defence
 
ID cards
 
Old folk
 
Hairy man
 
Democracy
 
Mud
 
The NHS
 
Violence
 
Effluent
 
Respect
 
Litter
 
Weapons
 
The church
 
Blame
 
Parenting
 
Paedophiles
 
The Pope
 
Punishing
 
Racism
 
Scientists
 
Smoking
 
Stupidity
 
Swimming
 
Envirocrap
 
Spying