Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back
11th September 2013: The world's gone mad and I'm the only one who knows
30th August 2013: Isn't sarcasm a wonderful thing?
25th August 2013: Operation Yewtree has turned British justice on its head
13th August 2013: Black is white. Fact. End of.
11th August 2013: Why 'human rights' is nothing of the sort ...
11th August 2013: Electric cars, not as green as they're painted?
6th August 2013: How the British nation treats its friends ...
8th July 2013: The BBC biased? How can that be? They're so NICE!
26th June 2013: Think this country is a bastion of freedom and justice and a shining model for the world? Think again.
18th June 2013: Wrinklies unite, you have nothing to lose but your walking frames!
17th June 2013: is the end finally approaching for this evil woman?
31st May 2013: Now it's official - the BBC really is a left-wing propaganda machine
31st May 2013: Those evil bastards are at it again. Yes, you've guessed it - social services!
27th May 2013: Well-known TV presenter talks sense. No good will come of it.
24th May 2013: British justice is best? Only for the very poor, apparently ...
17th May 2013: Some actual FACTS about climate change (for a change) from actual scientists ...
10th May 2013: An article about that poison gas, carbon dioxide, and other scientific facts (not) ...
10th May 2013: We need to see past the sex and look at the crimes: is justice being served?
8th May 2013: So, who would you trust to treat your haemorrhoids, Theresa May?
8th May 2013: Why should citizens in the 21st Century fear the law so much?
30th April 2013: What the GOS says today, the rest of the world realises tomorrow ...
30th April 2013: You couldn't make it up, could you? Luckily you don't need to ...
29th April 2013: a vote for NONE OF THE ABOVE, because THE ABOVE are crap ...
28th April 2013: what goes around, comes around?
19th April 2013: everyone's a victim these days ...
10th April 2013: Thatcher is dead; long live Thatcher!
8th April 2013: Poor people are such a nuisance. Just give them loads of money and they'll go away ...
26th March 2013: Censorship is alive and well and coming for you ...
25th March 2013: Just do your job properly, is that too much to ask?
25th March 2013: So, what do you think caused your heterosexuality?
20th March 2013: Feminists - puritans, hypocrites or just plain stupid?
18th March 2013: How Nazi Germany paved the way for modern governance?
13th March 2013: Time we all grew up and lived in the real world ...
12th March 2013: Hindenburg crash mystery solved? - don't you believe it!
6th March 2013: Is this the real GOS?
5th March 2013: All that's wrong with taxes
25th February 2013: The self-seeking MP who is trying to bring Britain down ...
24th February 2013: Why can't newspapers just tell the truth?
22nd February 2013: Trial by jury - a radical proposal
13th February 2013: A little verse for two very old people ...
6th February 2013: It's not us after all, it's worms
6th February 2013: Now here's a powerful argument FOR gay marriage ...
4th February 2013: There's no such thing as equality because we're not all the same ...
28th January 2013: Global Warming isn't over - IT'S HIDING!
25th January 2013: Global Warmers: mad, bad and dangerous to know ...
25th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
19th January 2013: We STILL haven't got our heads straight about gays ...
16th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
11th January 2013: What it's like being English ...
7th January 2013: Bleat, bleat, if it saves the life of just one child ...
7th January 2013: How best to put it? 'Up yours, Argentina'?
7th January 2013: Chucking even more of other people's money around ...
6th January 2013: Chucking other people's money around ...
30th December 2012: The BBC is just crap, basically ...
30th December 2012: We mourn the passing of a genuine Grumpy Old Sod ...
30th December 2012: How an official body sets out to ruin Christmas ...
16th December 2012: Why should we pardon Alan Turing when he did nothing wrong?
15th December 2012: When will social workers face up to their REAL responsibility?
15th December 2012: Unfair trading by a firm in Bognor Regis ...
14th December 2012: Now the company that sells your data is pretending to act as watchdog ...
7th December 2012: There's a war between cars and bikes, apparently, and  most of us never noticed!
26th November 2012: The bottom line - social workers are just plain stupid ...
20th November 2012: So, David Eyke was right all along, then?
15th November 2012: MPs don't mind dishing it out, but when it's them in the firing line ...
14th November 2012: The BBC has a policy, it seems, about which truths it wants to tell ...
12th November 2012: Big Brother, coming to a school near you ...
9th November 2012: Yet another celebrity who thinks, like Jimmy Saville, that he can behave just as he likes because he's famous ...
5th November 2012: Whose roads are they, anyway? After all, we paid for them ...
7th May 2012: How politicians could end droughts at a stroke if they chose ...
6th May 2012: The BBC, still determined to keep us in a fog of ignorance ...
2nd May 2012: A sense of proportion lacking?
24th April 2012: Told you so, told you so, told you so ...
15th April 2012: Aah, sweet ickle polar bears in danger, aah ...
15th April 2012: An open letter to Anglian Water ...
30th March 2012: Now they want to cure us if we don't believe their lies ...
28th February 2012: Just how useful is a degree? Not very.
27th February 2012: ... so many ways to die ...
15th February 2012: DO go to Jamaica because you definitely WON'T get murdered with a machete. Ms Fox says so ...
31st January 2012: We don't make anything any more
27th January 2012: There's always a word for it, they say, and if there isn't we'll invent one
26th January 2012: Literary criticism on GOS? How posh!
12th December 2011: Plain speaking by a scientist about the global warming fraud
9th December 2011: Who trusts scientists? Apart from the BBC, of course?
7th December 2011: All in all, not a good week for British justice ...
9th November 2011: Well what d'you know, the law really IS a bit of an ass ...

 

 
Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
Readers wives. Yes, really!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net

 

 
Older stuff
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
There's a lot of talk flying around about the likely effect of the Leveson legislation on bloggers and websites like Grumpy Old Sod. Rather ironic, isn't it, that a bunch of celebrities angry about press intrusions into their privacy should respond by interfering with the privacy of people who write stuff on the internet – people who were at no time and in no way involved in the phone-hacking. Still, it's all part of the so-called “liberal” left's ongoing campaign to silence all dissent, isn't it? They did it when they were in power under Blair and Harriet “Harridan” Harman, they're still working diligently away while they're in opposition, and we all know what to expect if they get back in 2015.
 
But legislation rarely reaches the streets with all the teeth it was born with, and there's a more pressing threat to our freedom of speech to deal with. American software giant Symantec and mobile phone provider O2 have combined to block a number of websites concerned with issues like domestic violence or sexual abuse against men by calling them “hate” sites. As John Kimble wrote recently on the Rights of Man website ...
 
By now most people are aware of the issue of men's rights websites being wrongly blocked by Symantec and various mobile phone companies due to them somehow being flagged as "hate sites". I've done further investigations and can exclusively reveal the official response from these companies on this matter. There tends to be a bit of confusion about this issue and so firstly I'll attempt to explain what's going on and tackle some misconceptions.
 
Which sites are blocked? I initially identified 48 sites blocked by Symantec/O2 and flagged as "hate sites". The list then grew to 58 as even more were identified. It's fair to say that a majority of key sites critical of feminism and supportive of men's rights are blocked.
 
What exactly does this mean for the sites concerned? The "hate site" classification means a number of users are denied any access, particularly people accessing the internet in some restaurants, workplaces and via mobile phone networks such as Telefonica/O2. In total Symantec claims 250 million users of the filter worldwide, so it could easily mean a 10% reduction in traffic for mens' rights sites.
 
How long has this being going on? It is uncertain as to exactly how long this has been an issue. I became aware of the problem in May 2012 though it appears to have been going on in some cases for at least two years. It must have been happening for a considerable length of time as some of the blocked sites no longer exist.
 
Other mens' rights activists and even member of the media have had difficulty getting any sort of meaningful response from Symantec so I've taken a different approach and been in touch with O2/Telefonica management. I asked them to classify the blocked websites more appropriately and to stop censoring such content. Eventually I was put in contact with O2's head of complaints, Antony Gibson, and he confirmed that O2 use the same filter service from Symantec, called Rulespace, thus explaining why the two block lists of the two companies are identical.
 
Mr Gibson liaised with Symantec and informed me they had reviewed the list and decided to reclassify just 2 out of the 47 sites I presented them with. This therefore means the "hate" classification/block officially stands for the bulk of this content (including avoiceformen.com) and is no accident. Mr Gibson explained that O2/Symantec regarded the sites to be at the "low end" of the spectrum in terms of hate and further explained that they were blocked and classed as "hate sites" due to reasons such as showing "aggression" and/or use of the term "anti-feminism"!
 
Mr Gibson did express some concern about people seeing men's rights sites listed as hate sites and smeared in this way, but O2's solution to our concerns is that they will disable their url checker so no one can see the reason why a site has been blocked. In other words O2 is fairly happy for the issue of human rights for men to be classed as hateful, their only concern is people finding out that they're taking this stance. So, now we have no just a case of censorship and defamation, but a cover up too!
 
To compound matters yet further, many of these sites classified as hateful really are incredibly innocuous and deal with very important issues, many don't even use the term "anti-feminist" either nor contain "aggression". Such a term is so vague and ambiguous as to be completely meaningless, and proves absolutely how the filter is arbitrary and a nonsense and completely open to abuse. More importantly, if O2/Symantec have an issue with the term "anti-feminist", then they are quite blatantly taking an extreme political stance in favour of an ideology. Afterall, there's barely any more "aggressive" way of supporting feminist doctrine than to censor and defame anyone who dares critique or correct it. I think this issue really sums up how important the men's' movement is today, not to mention the scale of the challenge facing us. We see countless feminist activists all over the media campaigning against free speech and equality and seeking privileges for women such as subsidised insurance premiums. Feminists make endless sexist comments telling men not to rape and even the host of the world's leading feminist radio programme openly laughs at male victims of domestic abuse. Whilst all this has been going on, and despite spending countless hours on the matter, I've failed with a simple request for companies to stop denying help to male victims of rape and domestic violence. In fact I can't even get these sick companies to remove their "hate site" smear from their classification of these vitally important resources. Perhaps I haven't yet been "aggressive" enough?
 
Here's a selection of sites O2/Symantec insist on keeping in their "hate site" category:
 
http://dvmen.org - A site in Colorado helping male victims of domestic violence
http://toysoldier.wordpress.com - A blog highlighting the plight of male victims of rape and abuse
http://www.ncfm.org -Website of the longest running men's human rights organisation in the US (founded in 1977)
http://www.fathersforlife.org - A site seeking for fathers to have a greater role in their children's lives
http://www.debunker.com/patriarchy.html - A webpage scientifically debunking the most common feminist myths
http://disenfranchisedfather.blogspot.co.uk - blog by a father who doesn't get to see his son
 
For those who are curious, apparently the only two non-"hateful" men's sites out of the 47 are:
Hisside.com and dadi.org and both are now unblocked.
 
Update:
O2 have been in touch and would like me to point out that O2 customers who are over 18 can remove the restriction and view any web site they want to by going through their age verification process. Customers without a credit card can visit an O2 store with photo ID such as a passport or driving licence.

 
A more comprehensive list of the blocked sites is here. We haven't looked at them all, so post them without live links so if you want to visit them you'll need to copy and paste them into your browser.
 
http://anirishmanagainstfeminism.blogspot.com
http://antifeminism.mathews.me.uk/
http://battlinbog.blog-city.com/
http://beatdeaddaddy.freewebtools.com/
http://callumphoenixrising.blogspot.com/
http://www.cooltools4men.com/
http://dhdiary.blogspot.com
http://www.dontmakehermad.com/
http://framedfathers.blogspot.com
http://www.genderwar.org/
http://www.hatemalepost.blogspot.com
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/verismo/
http://league-of-anti.blogspot.com
http://www.mens-network.org
http://mensaction.net
http://mens-links.net
http://mensrightsblogs.com
http://misformalevolent.blogspot.com
http://www.mralondon.org
http://siberianow.wordpress.com
http://sxmodels.blogspot.com
http://truthformen.wordpress.com
http://verlch.blogspot.com
 
Symantec Corporation is an American global computer security software corporation headquartered in Mountain View, California. It is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock market index. Symantec competes in the antivirus industry with its flagship brand Norton Antivirus and also owns Verisign.
 
James Williams wrote an entry on the Symantec Corporation page in Wikipedia but it was quickly removed. Here is his entry ...
 
It was discovered that Norton Symantec had unilaterally decided to block access to websites across the world dedicated to help combat problems faced by men and boys. With no supporting evidence these sites were declared 'hate sites'. Some of the sites helped men cope with domestic abuse they were suffering or boys struggling with family and educational problems. One site was engaged in helping soldiers overcome the effects of Post Traumatic Stress and adapt to civilian life. Because of Symantec's insensitive stance many human rights campaigners called for a boycott of all Norton products.
 
It's not the first time that these companies have censored the internet for reasons that are unclear. In 2011 they blocked the website of a Sheffield church, and in the same year some people claimed that they'd blocked Google Maps as well.
 

 
The GOS says: Of course one knows that stupidity always reigns unchecked, especially in large organisations. If these actions by Symantec and O2 were just mistakes, just cases where some plonker had misunderstood the nature and purpose of the websites he was looking at, one could understand. It would be annoying and ridiculous, but all they'd have to do is put the matter right and we'd all be happy.
 
But no, that's not what happened, is it? They've been told they've made a mistake, and they refuse to correct it. So one has to assume that this is a deliberate and political action to weaken the rights of men as opposed to women. Exactly, and I mean exactly, the kind of thing we can expect if this country slides to the left in the next few years. There's nothing wrong with left-wing politics per se - I considered myself a socialist for the first half of my life – but there's now a frightening hidden agenda riding on the back of normal socialist policy, and we started to see it under Blair and Brown: state interference with the speech and thoughts of ordinary people, a dense network of new laws governing every aspect of daily life, an army of new petty officials with arbitrary powers of enforcement, over 1,000 reasons for officials to invade the homes of ordinary people, and the enshrinement in law of the often abhorent views and practices of sexual and religious minorities, to the detriment of the rights and well-being of the general public.

 

 

 
Grumpy Old Sod.com - homepage
 

 
Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2013 The GOS
 
Grumpy Old Sod.com - homepage

 

Captain Grumpy's
Favourites
- some older posts

 
Campaign
 
Proposal
 
Burglars
 
Defence
 
ID cards
 
Old folk
 
Hairy man
 
Democracy
 
Mud
 
The NHS
 
Violence
 
Effluent
 
Respect
 
Litter
 
Weapons
 
The church
 
Blame
 
Parenting
 
Paedophiles
 
The Pope
 
Punishing
 
Racism
 
Scientists
 
Smoking
 
Stupidity
 
Swimming
 
Envirocrap
 
Spying