Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back
5th March 10: Suffolk Social Services. Bastards, bastards, bastards ...
5th March 10: Perhaps Captain Grumpy isn't as clever as he thought ...
26th February 10: Government snoopers are at it again ...
26th February 10: The BBC lying through its teeth again. How stupid do they think we are?
25th February 10: ... give some people a uniform and a day-glo jacket ...
21st February 10: ... all kicking off in sunny Suffolk ...
21st February 10: There's nothing sexy about being wicked, Ms.Harman...
21st February 10: When politicians talk glibly in billions ...
29th January 10: Jumping on the racial bandwagon ...
24th January 10: Good to think positively for a change ...
8th January 10: What are weather forecasters FOR, exactly?
3rd January 10: George Moonbat has finally lost his mind. Shame.
23rd December 09: You know that feeling that they're all out to get you?
16th December 09: Greenpeace hoist with their own petard ...
15th December 09: ... the most overweening, arrogant piece of self aggrandisement humankind has ever had the nerve to perpetrate ...
13th December 09: We're all paedophiles now, because the government says so ...
12th December 09: The BBC is not impartial or neutral - Andrew Marr
1st December 09: Not like those soft Southern bastards, then ...
1st December 09: Quis custodiet ipsos custodies?
1st December 09: ClimateGate. Oh, good!
27th November 09: MP's blunt attack on social service kidnap
25th November 09: Ommbudsmen - whose side are they on, exactly?
19th November 09: The spies looking over your shoulder - RIGHT NOW!
19th November 09: We all need protection from the child protectors ...
11th November 09: A sense of proportion? No, not much!
9th November 09: Shock! Horror! Is the GOS a gay-basher?
31st October 09: Whose side are they on? Bloody good question!
23rd October 09: A sad day for democracy and free speech
21st October 09: The law is already an ass. Why make it worse?
20th October 09: But who are we to criticise? I mean, Brains R'n't Us, exactly, are they?
17th October 09: Here's looking at you, kid ...
14th October 09: What I did on my holiday, by an MP
9th October 09: Hollywood gets science wrong ...
9th October 09: Stick to arresting old ladies - it's safer
6th October 09: Cheer up, it could be worse. You could be American ...
4th October 09: Just what did the Irish electorate thing they were voting for?
30th September 09: Two new campaigns we think you should support - we do
30th September 09: Pandas - useless, boring and suicidal ...
25th September 09: It is for the state to define who may speak and who must be silent
22nd September 09: Two wheels good. Four wheels ba-a-a-a-ad!
18th September 09: It's official - we're all paedophiles now ...
18th September 09: So can private carparking contractors really enforce their tickets?
13th September 09: How nice to know there are experts tirelessly looking out for us ...
12th September 09: Our brave new Britain: speak your mind and lose your children ...
9th September 09: You mark my words, no good'll come of it. Far too sensible ...
9th September 09: GOS - a bit slow on the uptake, to be honest ...
9th September 09: Not a lot of people know this ...

 

 
Our Wanker of the Week award
Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
Readers wives. Yes, really!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net
Sign our Guest Book
 

 
Older stuff
 

 
NO2ID - Stop ID cards and the database state
 

 

 

 

 
I've been having a bit of a break the last few weeks, partly because of Christmas but mainly because of having to tend to sick and elderly relatives. My apologies to anyone who's written and hasn't received a reply, and to those of you who must have been wondering where all the new grumpy pages had got to (the fact the the Guestbook disappeared for a couple of days was nothing to do with me - it's hosted by another website and I have no idea what happened to it).
 
Of course this doesn't mean I haven't been grumpy (far from it - it was bloody Christmas, after all). Indeed, I have a number of news stories saved up in my "to do" folder, some of which will eventually see the light of day. But there was one news story that absolutely made my grumpy blood boil, so here it is ...
 
The Daily Mail (who else) ran a story by one Paul Sims about a couple who allegedly set out to climb Snowdon during a blizzard with their toddler in a harness on her father's back. The story was based on one photograph, and no facts whatsoever.
 
The Mail said "As the snow fell and the temperature around them dipped below freezing they ignored the repeated warnings and began climbing. Trudging through several inches of snow, the couple struggled on as the blizzard-like conditions hit Snowdonia, North Wales, with a vengeance. But what made their attempt even more unthinkable was the fact that they chose to take their young daughter with them. She cannot have been any more than two years old. Yet she sat in a harness on her father's back with only a plastic cover protecting her face from the arctic conditions that surrounded them."
 
But when you read the article carefully, it turned out to be entirely untrue. There was no blizzard - the photograph proved that. It was snowing, sure enough, but if there had been a blizzard the photograph couldn't have been taken. You can't see more than a few feet in a blizzard, and this photograph was taken from a considerable distance through a telephoto lens. Still, what the hell: to the average Daily Mail reader a few flakes of snow is a blizzard.
 
The couple did not attempt to climb Snowdon, which for those Daily Mail readers whose life experience is bounded by the arms of the sofa, is a bloody great mountain. The article says "The couple left their car at Pen-y-pass, then started to walk up the snow-covered miners' track, which leads towards the 3,560ft summit of Snowdon". Nice touch, that, to mention the height. Nice, but a bit misleading: the poor couple were nowhere near the summit, they were walking along a fairly level road capable of taking four-wheel vehicles. Right enough, if they'd kept going for about ten miles they might have ended up near the top as that's where the road eventually leads, but after a mile or so they turned round and came back having enjoyed, presumably, a bracing and unchallenging walk in the countryside.
 

Some snow ...

 
The author of the article tried to get an inflammatory quote from the chairman of the local mountain rescue team, but Elfyn Jones was a bit too canny for that. He merely said: 'I hope they're not heading towards the summit or going high up the mountain, because there are gale force winds and temperatures down to minus 4 or 5.' Quite correct, Elfyn. There was no need for you to worry because they weren't doing anything of the sort.
 
So Paul Sims had to content himself with linking the story to various more serious events around the country. The couple took their walk on a day when "police and rescuers launched a special campaign to persuade climbers and walkers to take proper precautions". Paul forgot to look closely at the photograph, though, or he'd have seen that the couple are wearing some very serious walking boots, expensive specialist winter clothing, were carrying walking poles and had their daughter in a purpose-made papoose with an all-over transparent hood. These were no novices.
 
Nevertheless, the Mail points out that "The climb occurred on a day of tragedy as the weather wreaked havoc across the country and left a total of six people dead. Three men were killed in a car crash on the M62 in West Yorkshire and two climbers, one from Wiltshire and one from Wales, died in an avalanche on Ben Nevis." A 53-year-old climber from Derbyshire also died in an avalanche in Wester Ross, and two other walkers were rescued in Argyll. A car crash in West Yorkshire killed three men, and in Cumbria the treacherous weather led to a seven car pile-up on the A66, closing a stretch of the road and leaving up to 50 other cars stranded.
 
All of this was, of course, the fault of the couple taking their daughter for a two mile stroll in the snow. How irresponsible of them.
 
This was truly dreadful, reprehensible reporting, the sort of hysterical distortion that ought to be beneath even a gutter rag like the Mail.
 
And what made it even worse was the inevitable response from Daily Mail readers, 357 of them. It made no difference that a few lone voices tried to point out the facts - rather noticeably people who either live in colder countries than this, or have experience of outdoor activities, or who know Snowdonia well - and explain that the couple were doing nothing out of the ordinary, had acted perfectly sensibly and courted no danger to themselves or their child.
 
No, no, Mail readers are rarely hampered by anything so mundane as facts or actual experience. Prejudice, hysteria and spite are more their mark. Response after response on the Mail website called the couple "idiots" and "morons", questioned their intelligence, and suggested that they should (a) be named and shamed, (b) be immediately imprisoned, preferably for life, and (c) have their child and any future issue wrenched from them and put into care. There were even allusions to the story of Madeleine McCann. I'm not going to dignify their jealous bile by quoting any of it, but do follow the link and have a look yourself. It's a shameful exhibition of vicious, self-righteous ignorance. These people have the vote, for God's sake, and the rest of us have to share the planet with them.
 

 
The GOS says: It would give me the greatest pleasure to hear that the couple have enough money and determination to instruct their solicitors and sue the Daily Mail for defamation or something. If they should chance to read this page, I'd be delighted to hear from them. I might even make a donation to their costs.
 
Many years ago I taught at a private school in the Highlands of Scotland - now closed, sadly. The school placed a strong emphasis on practical activity and service to the community, and sixth form boys could apply to join the Mountain Rescue Service. They were highly trained by local experts, and were one of the official mountain rescue teams for the Glencoe area.
 
Part of their training was "snow-holing": in the winter groups would climb to the top of a three thousand foot mountain, dig holes in the snow, cook and sleep the night there. For those in the know about such things, this is a normal activity among mountaineers, and perfectly safe with the right equipment and preparation. Certainly no boys were ever lost or harmed, and the beneficial effect on their confidence and competence must have been immense.
 
I'm just trying to imagine what the Daily Mail would say if that happened today. Er ...... no, can't think ....

 

 
Last week's Wanker
 

 

 

 
Grumpy Old Sod.com - homepage
 

 
Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2009 The GOS
 
Grumpy Old Sod.com - homepage
 

Captain Grumpy's
Favourites
- some older posts

 
Campaign
 
Proposal
 
Burglars
 
Defence
 
ID cards
 
Old folk
 
Hairy man
 
Democracy
 
Mud
 
The NHS
 
Violence
 
Effluent
 
Respect
 
Litter
 
Weapons
 
The church
 
Blame
 
Parenting
 
Paedophiles
 
The Pope
 
Punishing
 
Racism
 
Scientists
 
Smoking
 
Stupidity
 
Swimming
 
Envirocrap
 
Spying